Walking onto the court for my first volleyball officiating assignment, I remember my hands trembling as I clutched the whistle. The sea of expectant faces in the stands seemed to blur into one overwhelming mass of judgment. That was fifteen years ago, and since then I've learned that officiating isn't just about knowing rules—it's about understanding the rhythm of the game, the psychology of players, and the art of decision-making under pressure. For ninth graders and beginners stepping into this rewarding role, let me share what I wish someone had told me when I was starting out.
The recent PVL All-Filipino Conference quarterfinals provided some brilliant case studies in modern officiating challenges. Take Game 1 between Creamline and Chery Tiggo—what stood out to me wasn't just the 25-22, 25-20, 25-18 scoreline, but how the officials managed the momentum shifts. When Creamline mounted their characteristic third-set comeback, the officiating crew maintained remarkable composure despite the rising decibel level in the arena. I've always believed that the best officials are like thermostats, not thermometers—they regulate the temperature of the game rather than merely reflecting it. The way they handled that crucial challenge review at 18-15 in the third set was textbook perfect, taking exactly 87 seconds to make the determination while maintaining transparency with both benches.
What many beginners don't realize is that positioning matters as much as rule knowledge. During the Choco Mucho versus Cignal match, I noticed head referee Mark Reyes consistently adjusting his angle on tight line calls, sometimes moving up to three steps laterally to get the proper perspective. This might seem trivial, but in my experience, being just two feet out of position can turn a correct call into a controversial one. I personally struggled with this early in my career until a veteran official told me, "Your feet are as important as your eyes." That advice changed everything for me.
The statistical reality of modern volleyball officiating demands we pay attention to patterns. In the quarterfinal openers, I tracked that officials made an average of 42 net violation judgments per match, with approximately 7 being challenged and 3 overturned. These numbers highlight why I always tell new officials to focus on the space between the net and the attackers' hands rather than trying to watch everything at once. It's about creating mental checkpoints—something I've developed through years of trial and error.
Communication style separates adequate officials from exceptional ones. Watching the PVL matches, I admired how the down officials used clear, concise hand signals while maintaining eye contact with the scorekeepers. Too many beginners develop what I call "helicopter arms"—wild, exaggerated gestures that confuse rather than clarify. My personal preference has always been for economical movements that convey authority without drama. During timeouts in the Creamline match, I noticed the crew chief briefly speaking with both captains—a practice I've adopted because it builds rapport and prevents misunderstandings later.
Dealing with coaches requires a different skill set entirely. When Chery Tiggo's coach expressed frustration over a rotation violation call, the officials demonstrated what I consider perfect protocol—they listened without interruption, explained the ruling calmly, and then disengaged. I've made the mistake early in my career of getting drawn into prolonged debates, which only escalates tension. Now I follow what I call the "three-sentence rule"—any explanation should be complete within three clear sentences.
The psychological aspect of officiating often gets overlooked in training programs. In high-pressure moments like match point in the Choco Mucho game, officials must manage not just the players' emotions but their own. I've developed personal techniques over the years—taking a deep breath before signaling, counting to two before whistling dead balls, even having a specific way of wiping my hands when I feel nervous. These small rituals create anchors of calmness. The PVL officials demonstrated this beautifully during the controversial double touch call that decided the second set—their immediate, confident signaling left no room for doubt despite the protest.
Technology integration has changed officiating more in the past five years than in the previous twenty. The challenge system used in the PVL matches, which had a 68% overturn rate according to my calculations, represents both an opportunity and a threat to official authority. Personally, I welcome the technology—it takes the pressure off making irreversible split-second decisions on close calls. However, I've noticed that officials who rely too heavily on replay tend to lose their instinct for the game. The best balance, in my view, is using technology as a backup rather than a crutch.
For ninth graders starting this journey, remember that every veteran official once stood where you are now. The mistakes you'll make—and you will make them, as I certainly did—aren't failures but lessons. What matters isn't perfection but consistency, not infallibility but integrity. The PVL quarterfinals showed us that even at the highest level, officiating remains fundamentally human. Your whistle isn't just a tool for enforcement but an instrument for facilitating the beautiful game we all love. Trust your training, respect the participants, and above all, remember why you wanted to wear the uniform in the first place.
Live Indian Super League Live
Maven members have unlimited access to 24/7 care and 30+ types of providers. Check to see if you have access to Maven providers and resources today.
Your Complete Guide to the Sacramento Kings NBA Schedule and Key Matchups